Intolerant discourse and the public sphere

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.5.10.20

Keywords:

hate speech, freedom of expression, democracy, intolerance, public sphere

Abstract

Cultural and political diversity inherent in today's societies is a potential focus of conflicts. At the center of such conflicts lies the hate speech controversy and its restriction by the criminal law, emerging the question about the legitimacy of democratic deliberation restriction in order to protect as a vehicle to encourage the speech of those minorities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ash, T. G. (2016). Free Speech. London.

Boix Palop, A. (2016). La construcción de los límites a la libertad de expresión en las redes sociales. Revista de Estudios Políticos, 173.

Boladeras Cucurella, M. (2001). La opinión pública en Habermas. Anàlisi, 26.

Brettschneider, C. (2013). Value Democracy as the Basis for Viewpoint Neutrality. Northwestern University Law Review, 107.

Fiss, O. (1996). La ironía de la libertad de expresión. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Forst, R. (2008). Toleration, justice and reason. En McKinnon y Castiglione, The culture of toleration in diverse societies. Manchester.

Greenawalt, K. (1996). Fighting Words. Individuals, Communities, and Liberties of Speech. Princeton.

Habermas, J. (1998) Facticidad y validez. Madrid.

Hare, I. y Weinstein, J. (2009). Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford.

Knight, J. y Johnson, J. (1997). What Sort of Equality Does Deliberative Democracy Require? En Bohman y Rehg, Deliberative Democracy, Essays on Reasons and Politics. Cambridge.

Matsuda, M. J., Lawrence III, C. R., Delgado, R., Williams Crenshaw, K. (1993). Words that Wound. Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech and the First Amendement. Boulder.

Malik, M. (2009) Extreme Speech and Liberalism. En Hare y Weinstein, Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford.

McKinnon, C. (2006). Toleration. A critical introduction. Oxon.

Post, R. (1990). The Constitutional Concept of Public Discourse: Outrageous Opinion, Democratic Deliberation, and Hustler Magazine v. Falwell. Harvard Law Review, 103.

Post, R. (1991). Racist Speech, Democracy, and the First Amendment. William & Mary Law Review, 32.

Post, R. (2009). Hate Speech. En Hare y Weinstein, Extreme Speech and Democracy. Oxford.

Post, R. (2012). Interview with Robert Post. En Herz y Molnar, The Content and Context of Hate Speech. Rethinking Regulation and Responses.

Rawls, J. (2004). El liberalismo político. Barcelona.

Sampedro Blanco, V. (2000). Opinión pública y democracia deliberativa. Medios, sondeos y urnas. Madrid.

Sunstein, C. (1993). Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech. New York.

Sunstein, C. (2003). Why Societies Need Dissent. Cambridge.

Sunstein, C. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton.

Taylor, C. (2003). La política del reconocimiento. En VV.AA., Multiculturalismo y la política del reconocimiento. México.

Todorov, T. (2012). Los enemigos íntimos de la democracia. Barcelona.

Waldron, J. (2012). The Harm in Hate Speech. Harvard.

Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration. New Haven.

Weinstein, J. (2001). Hate Speech, Viewpoint Neutrality and the American Concept of Democracy. En Hensley, The Boundaries of Freedom of Expression & Order in American Democracy. Kent.

West, C. (2012). Words That Silence? Freedom of Expression and Racist Hate Speech. En Maitra y McGowan, Speech and Harm. Oxford.

Published

2018-11-01

How to Cite

Intolerant discourse and the public sphere. (2018). Revista De La Asociación Española De Investigación De La Comunicación, 5(10), 39-45. https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.5.10.20