Platform capitalism and administrative culture: theoretical discussion of the algorithmic culture industry

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.12.24.3

Keywords:

algorithm, digital culture, political economy of communication, data justice, critical theory

Abstract

Contemporary digital culture is shaped by algorithmic dispositifs that, beyond managing access to content, organize aesthetic experience according to principles of profitability, efficiency, and segmentation. Under platform capitalism, the promises of innovation, diversity, and participation are functionally integrated into the logic of cultural administration and instrumental reason. While platformization introduces far-reaching technological innovations, it also reproduces key continuities with the mechanisms of standardization and control characteristic of mass society, as described by Critical Theory in its critique of the culture industry. Through a conceptual reconstruction grounded in a dialectical perspective, and informed by a critical theory and political economy of communication and culture, the article examines contemporary phenomena such as algorithmic pseudo-individualization, digital aestheticization, and predictive personalization. The continuities and mutations of administered culture are explored considering the regime of the algorithmic culture industry. This article, as a theoretical contribution, foregrounds negativity emerges as a central category to interrogate its limits and conditions of total administration, not only offering a critique of its mechanisms of social reproduction and integration, but also reclaiming the possibilities for transformative resistance it still holds.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ángel Carrasco-Campos, Universidad de Valladolid (UVA)

    Associate Professor in the Department of Sociology and Social Work at the University of Valladolid (Spain), and coordinator of the Master's Degree in Communication for Social Purposes at the same institution. Member of the Recognized Research Group in Applied Social Sciences and of the Advanced Studies in Communication Group (GEAC). Since February 2021, he has served as President of the Spain Chapter of the Latin Union of Political Economy of Information, Communication and Culture (ULEPICC-España). His main research areas include critical theory of communication and culture, epistemology of the social sciences, and the sociology of communication and science. He has participated in numerous research projects and contracts, and is currently the Principal Investigator of the project Internationalization of Communication Research in Spain (ResinCom), funded by the Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities.

References

Adorno, T. W. (1966). Televisión y cultura de masas. Eudecor.

Adorno, T. W. (1992). Resignación. Laguna. Revista de Filosofía, (1), 95–99.

Adorno, T. W. (2004). Teoría estética. Akal.

Adorno, T. W. (2005). Dialéctica negativa. Akal.

Adorno, T. W. (2008). Resumen sobre la industria cultural. En Sin imagen directriz. Akal.

Aesthetics Wiki. (s. f.). Lo-fi Art. Aesthetics Wiki. Recuperado de https://aesthetics.fandom.com/wiki/Lo-fi_Art

Bauman, Z. (2007). Vida de consumo. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Benjamin, W. (1973). La obra de arte en la época de su reproductibilidad técnica. En Discursos interrumpidos I. Taurus.

Carrasco-Campos, Á. (2010). Industria cultural e ideología. Mercado, cultura y comunicación. En R. Zallo & Á. Badillo (Eds.), Mercado y políticas de comunicación en el mercado global (pp. 331–340). Universidad de Salamanca.

Carrasco-Campos, Á. (2016). Teoría crítica e investigación comunicativa: fundamentos teóricos y horizonte epistemológico. En La pantalla insomne (pp. 2436–2449). Sociedad Latina de Comunicación Social.

Carrasco-Campos, Á. (2021). La Escuela de Frankfurt y la investigación crítica de la comunicación y la cultura. En F. Sierra (Ed.), Economía política de la comunicación. Teoría y metodología (pp. 67–94). Comunicación Social.

Chateau, L. (2022). The alienated aesthetics of purposefully-poor images. Aesthetic Investigations, 5(2), 173–193. https://aestheticinvestigations.eu/article/view/12085

Coleman, G. (2013). Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton University Press.

Couldry, N., & Mejias, U. A. (2019). The costs of connection: How data is colonizing human life and appropriating it for capitalism. Stanford University Press.

Data Justice Lab. (s. f.). About. https://datajusticelab.org

Dencik, L., Hintz, A., Redden, J., & Treré, E. (2022). Data justice. Sage.

Foucault, M. (1977). Vigilar y castigar. Siglo XXI.

Fuchs, C. (2014). Social media: A critical introduction. Sage.

Fuchs, C. (2022). Digital capitalism. Media, communication and society (Vol. 3). Routledge.

Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738

Goriunova, O. (2012). Art platforms and cultural production on the Internet. Routledge.

Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1994). Dialéctica de la Ilustración. Fragmentos filosóficos. Trotta.

Know Your Meme. (s. f.). Brain Rot / Brainrot. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/brain-rot-brainrot

Know Your Meme. (s. f.). Shitposting. https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/shitposting

Marcuse, H. (1968). El hombre unidimensional. Seix Barral.

Marcuse, H. (1981). Eros y civilización. Ariel.

Marcuse, H. (2011). Acerca del carácter afirmativo de la cultura. El Cuenco de Plata.

Mosco, V. (2004). The Digital Sublime: Myth, Power, and Cyberspace. MIT Press.

Nieborg, D. B., & Poell, T. (2018). The platformization of cultural production: Theorizing the contingent cultural commodity. New Media & Society, 20(11), 4275-4292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769694

Paasonen, S. (2021). Dependent, distracted, bored: Affective formations in networked media. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11903.001.0001

Petre, C., Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2019). ‘Gaming the system’: Platform fetishism and the affective economy of visibility. Social Media + Society, 5(3), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119879995

Poell, T., Nieborg, D. B., & Duffy, B. E. (2021). Platforms and cultural production. John Wiley & Sons.

Raley, R. (2009). Tactical media. University of Minnesota Press.

Sano-Franchini, J., & Carpenter, K. (2023). Critical Digital Interface Analysis and Social Justice. Technical Communication, 70(4), 1–7. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27340640

Scolari, C. A. (2024). Sobre la evolución de los medios: Emergencia, adaptación y supervivencia. Ediciones Ampersand.

Srnicek, N. (2016). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.

Tactical Tech Collective. (s. f.). Data Detox Kit. https://datadetoxkit.org

Treré, E., & Bonini, T. (2024). Algorithms of resistance: The everyday fight against platform power. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14329.001.0001

Van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.

What is Glitch Art? (s. f.). Glitchology. https://glitchology.com/glitch-art-guides/what-is-glitch-art/

Published

2025-10-31

How to Cite

Platform capitalism and administrative culture: theoretical discussion of the algorithmic culture industry. (2025). Revista De La Asociación Española De Investigación De La Comunicación, 12(24). https://doi.org/10.24137/raeic.12.24.3